The Critical Filipinx Studies series has from its inception aimed to not only advance key questions in the interdisciplinary field of Filipino or Filipinx Studies but also to illuminate the issues and struggles on-the-ground Filipinx communities face daily. Inspired by the praxis of author and labor organizer, scholar-activist Carlos Bulosan, this series centers those who adopt a stance of care—ethical and political commitment—toward the people whose lives animate their work.
It is perhaps most appropriate that the inaugural book of the series is penned by Dr. Valerie Francisco-Menchavez. Francisco-Menchavez is an award-winning scholar-activist, researcher, writer, and associate professor at San Francisco State University. Her forthcoming book, Caring for Caregivers: Filipina Migrant Workers and Community Building during Crisis, focuses on the experiences of Filipina caregivers, a demographic that Francisco-Menchavez knows intimately because many of her family members were employed as caregivers.
This aspect of her family history is ultimately what drove Francisco-Menchavez’s activism. Throughout her time in academia, Francisco-Menchavez has volunteered to support caregivers—and other care workers’—grassroots organizing efforts. This political commitment has shaped her scholarship; indeed, Francisco-Menchavez’s scholarship has served as another site for activism.
What follows are edited excerpts from a candid Q&A session between me and Valerie.
Robyn Magalit Rodriguez: Can you give me a brief synopsis of your book?
Valerie Franciso-Menchavez: So in my mind, Caring for Caregivers is one of the first sustained, sociological examinations of Filipino caregivers. For me, it was part memoir, part sociological research/academic writing. I was writing the book from my perspective as someone who grew up in care homes, whose family members—a majority of my family members—worked as caregivers. Doing research with caregivers for close to six years now, I felt like I was both using my sociological skills to analyze the industry while also writing down what many activists, organizers, and advocates already know about the industry. These folks don’t always have somewhere to point to academically that legitimizes what they have always known.
My book is an intimate look at what it’s like to be a caregiver, and it also serves these other purposes around advocacy, organizing, and activism. For me, this book is a really special piece of writing. To be honest, I feel like it’s the closest to myself that I’ve written. I feel like, “Oh, this is me,” as Val the scholar and organizer.
Rodriguez: Thank you. Can you maybe speak a little more to what it means that you wrote this book in a way that feels more like you, that it reflects your voice more? You mentioned that it’s also part memoir. How might have you been constrained in the past from writing in your voice?
Francisco-Menchavez: My first book, The Labor of Care, was my dissertation turned into a book, and I needed it for tenure. I really wanted to write close to the discipline and be legible to sociologists and Asian Americanists as well as women and gender studies scholars. I think what changed was, one, receiving tenure, then two, the passing of my brother-in-law, Bill. His passing gave me the courage and bravery to be more honest about what kind of writer and what kind of scholar I wanted to be. Bill’s passing was sudden and tragic. He was also a caregiver. In fact, lots of his family are Tongan caregivers. When he was alive, we would talk about what it’s like to work in that industry and how monotonous and exhausting it was. Showing up for him [through this book] is necessary work.
Real and sustainable change for domestic workers in this country requires intergenerational dialogue.
Valerie Francisco-Menchavez
I think of two particular moments in the book where I feel like I’m writing in my own voice as an author and not as an academic. First is when I reflect on what a morning looked like for my grandmother, who was a caregiver. I write from the perspective of my nine-year-old immigrant self. The second moment is the chapter on kwentuhan, which I’ve tried to develop in my scholarship, and refers to a talk-story method that is rooted in Filipino cultural practice. The kwentuhan chapter was me trying to say to fellow activists and organizers that social science methods like kwentuhan may not break down imperialist, capitalist systems, but it is a tool. It’s a tool that I know, from my experience as an activist, as an organizer, as a kasama (Filipino term for “comrade”), as a scholar, it’s a tool that can help build and bridge relationships in our community.
This kind of bravery, this courage to say, “I said what I said,” I’ve not had that in the past. I’ve not had that courage in the past. And I think my conversations with you, with [UW Press acquisitions editor] Mike Baccam, encouraging me to not have to rely on disciplinary frameworks for every argument made me courageous enough to write from a nine-year-old perspective, to write from a perspective of someone who has done the work of kwentuhan.
Rodriguez: You talk a lot about the kinds of ways that you bring your activist or scholar-activist self into this book. I wonder if you can come up with a few key takeaways that you hope community organizers or activists especially might take from your book.
Francisco-Menchavez: I love that question. I think one is that when organizers and activists want to be in solidarity and organize with migrant care workers, they must acknowledge that organizing practices have to center radical care. These care workers are providing paid care work and oftentimes underpaid, undervalued, waged care work for other people. They provide care work for their families in the Philippines. They group up in their churches, in their community centers, in their grocery stores, and provide care for one another.
Therefore, the way that we as advocates, as activists, scholars, and organizers should move with them is to center their humanity and their dignity. That might seem super basic, but I think when we’re trying, for example, to advance legislation for the health and safety of care workers, we don’t see them as people who actually need a ride to the meeting or who can also get sick. When we don’t recognize their vulnerability as human beings, then we sort of lose the essence of why we are doing organizing and activist work with them.
Number two, I really think that we (as activists, organizers, and advocates) need to put care workers at the center of decision-making. We need to really follow their lead on what leadership development looks like or what kinds of changes that they might want [for their lives].
Lastly, I believe that real and sustainable change for domestic workers in this country requires intergenerational dialogue. If we don’t include young people in the conversation about elder care or childcare or care work in general, we’re missing a generation or potentially many generations that will inevitably have care work as part of their lives in the future.
Valerie Francisco-Menchavez is associate professor in the Department of Sociology and Sexuality Studies at San Francisco State University and author of The Labor of Care: Filipina Migrants and Transnational Families in the Digital Age.
Robyn Magalit Rodriguez is professor and chair of Asian American Studies at the University of California, Davis and coeditor of Contemporary Asian American Activism: Building Movements for Liberation.
Related Books
















































